A commonly invoked anti-hacking law is so overbroad that it criminalizes conduct as innocuous as using a fake user name on Facebook or fibbing about your weight in a Match.com profile, one of the nation's most respected legal authorities has said.This came to prominence when the DoJ decided to prosecute the infamous (and unsuccessful) Lori Drew Myspace cyberbulling prosecution.
And the Response of the USDepartment of Justice?
In fact, quite the opposite: Downing and the Justice Department want to expand the law’s scope and impose harsher sentences on cybercriminals.What you have to understand here is that the goal of the DoJ is to have another "arrow in their quiver".
As CNET reported, the Justice Department is after an expansion of its powers under CFAA because of what happened when the agency attempted to prosecute Lori Drew, a Missouri mother who created a phony MySpace account to harass her 13-year-old neighbor, who later committed suicide. Drew was in 2008 convicted under CFAA of felony conspiracy and three counts of intentionally accessing a protected computer without authorization.
They want to have a world where everyone can be criminally prosecuted for something, because that way, they can go after anyone that they find inconvenient.
The fact that the Obama DoJ is in full throated support of this is why I refer to him as the "The Worst Constitutional Law Professor Ever".
When you give the state security apparatus the power to manufacture criminality, which is the desire of most agents of the state security apparatus, you create a blueprint for tyranny.
Yes, it is worse than a lame-ass Star Trek series.
ReplyDelete