It is clear that anything else would have undercut both Obama's credibility and the idea of civilian control of the military.
That being said, it was a lot more, it:
- Got rid of a corrupt and political officer with a long history of being a Bush admin butt boy (Tillman, torture at the Camp Nama prison camp, his earlier insubordination, etc.)
- He put someone in charge whom the Republicans are TREMENDOUSLY invested in (Petraeus), and so inoculated himself somewhat from any potential downsides.
- He has given some ownership of the Afghanistan war to another corrupt and political officer with a long history of being a Bush admin butt boy, and if Davey (Petraeus) is kept busy, he won't be leaking stories to undermine the timeline.
- It is clear that this is a temporary appointment, so Obama can replace Petraeus at any time because it's clear that being head of CENTCOM and Afghanistan is too much
- At that time, he can appoint someone who won't lobby to undermine the time-line.
- Petraeus will be too busy to engage in political machinations over the next few months.
It seems we both got what we wanted out of this move. You were right on the need to fire McC, I was wrong. However, Obama's move gave "me" the political cover I wanted this move to have.
ReplyDelete