I saw it, I read it, and thought that it was sophomoric bullsh@$ of the sort you frequently see college students who want to play at radicalism, both left and right.
One of the people who called him out on this was Paul Krugman, who said that he could not, "fathom is how any editor could think this was a good thing to appear in the FT’s pages," and James Fallows, who suggested that would like to see him, "discussing this over a beer with his Harvard colleague Henry Louis Gates."
I did not blog about it, because I didn't have anything to add, but Niall Furguson decided not to let sleeping dogs lie, and he did discuss it with Dr. Gates.
So Krugman offers an apology of sorts:
What can I say? While the Ferguson line was deeply offensive — everyone I know asked, “Did he really write that? Did the FT actually publish it?” — it never occurred to me that it had anything to do with the question of whether Felix the Cat was supposed to be African-American. The mind reels.(emphasis mine)
For the record, I don’t think that Professor Ferguson is a racist.
I think he’s a poseur.
I’m told that some of his straight historical work is very good. When it comes to economics, however, he hasn’t bothered to understand the basics, relying on snide comments and surface cleverness to convey the impression of wisdom. It’s all style, no comprehension of substance.
And this time he ended up choking on his own snark.
Remind me to never demand an apology of Nobel Prize winning economists.
No comments:
Post a Comment