The official reason is because they believe that an indictment would "harm peace efforts", but I think that it's because there are other regimes out there, and I'm not limiting myself to Mugabe, who would be subject to possible prosecution from the International Criminal Court.
It appears that the Darfur rebels understand this too:
Djibril Bassole, the joint U.N.-AU Darfur mediator made his first visit to Sudan on Sunday to try to revive a stalled peace process. But Khalil Ibrahim, head of the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM), said his rebel group would no longer recognise AU efforts to mediate a peace process.Of course, it's not like the African Union had much credibility left anyway.
"The African Union is a biased organisation and is protecting dictators and neglecting the African people," Ibrahim, head of JEM, the most militarily powerful rebel group, told Reuters from Darfur.
Sherif Harir, a senior member of the Sudan Liberation Army Unity faction, also told Reuters that for any AU mediation to succeed, it would have to answer why it had taken such a stance.
"The AU by so doing has indicated to the people of Darfur that they can die and it's not as important as protecting a president who has taken power by military coup," he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment