You favor eliminating the cap on earnings subject to the 12.4 percent Social Security tax, which now covers only the first $102,000. A Chicago police officer married to a Chicago public-school teacher, each with 20 years on the job, have a household income of $147,501, so you would take another $5,642 from them. Are they undertaxed? Are they rich?Dude, the $102K limit is per individual. Their tax load does not change, they are both taxed on their total earnings.
Truth be told, I don't think that there is a problem with Social Security, but there is one with Medicare, so here is my suggestion about how to fix that:
- End the cap on employers' part of the Social Security tax, and devote the additional revenue to Medicare and Medicaid.
- Broaden the definition of earnings to include things like the sweetheart deals that senior executives get.
- Tax the employee's part of income at levels above $1 million.
- This would mean that there is a "notch" between $102K and $1M. You can call it the Paris Hilton tax.
No comments:
Post a Comment