Early in Senator John McCain’s first run for the White House eight years ago, waves of anxiety swept through his small circle of advisers.There is no specific allegation of any sort of physical or romantic relationship, but his aides were concerned enough about this that someone had a serious talk to him, and they prevented further contact between McCain and Iseman, forming a sort of a human shield.
A female lobbyist had been turning up with him at fund-raisers, visiting his offices and accompanying him on a client’s corporate jet. Convinced the relationship had become romantic, some of his top advisers intervened to protect the candidate from himself — instructing staff members to block the woman’s access, privately warning her away and repeatedly confronting him, several people involved in the campaign said on the condition of anonymity.
When news organizations reported that Mr. McCain had written letters to government regulators on behalf of the lobbyist’s client, the former campaign associates said, some aides feared for a time that attention would fall on her involvement.
Let's be clear, it's entirely possible that they never did anything physical. What's more it could be possible that they never expressed to each other, or to anyone else any romantic feelings.
To put it in a military perspective, fraternization between an Officer and an Enlisted man does not have to involve romance. A BFF (Best Friends Forever) relationship is inappropriate within a chain of command.
That being said, given his involvement with con artist Charles Keating and his role as one of the Keating 5, where he was "just doing favors for a friend", it is remarkably intemperate. It was insanely reckless.
John McCain has has a reputation for outbursts and instability, and it calls his judgment into question.
To quote a friend of his:
“He is essentially an honorable person,” said William P. Cheshire, a friend of Mr. McCain who as editorial page editor of The Arizona Republic defended him during the Keating Five scandal. “But he can be imprudent.”
This at best brings his judgment, his common sense, and his commitment to really changing things in Washington into question.
The issue is not whether he had sex with that woman. It is why he forged such a close relationship with a lobbyist, and did favors for her after having experienced what he himself calls his catharsis in the Keating matter.
To put it bluntly at best is he reckless, and is he nuts.
*Well, young to me. She's 40 and I'm 45.
No comments:
Post a Comment